Preface: “Commies in Suits & Other Tweed Jackets”
The preface to my "Industrial Zionism" book. Will be publishing each section with editing to include developments of the last 18 months.
Although South American jungles and the sands of the Middle East might reflect the general public view of the communist image, perhaps this is a ‘desert sands mirage’? Contemporary ‘Commies’ wash and dress well, and attend Georgetown University in between martinis and formulating America’s domestic and foreign policies. They fly business or first class to London or Bern Switzerland and sit in the cool smooth leather of Chesterfield lounge chairs at the local Gentleman’s Club. These pseudo-Roman literati, travel ‘long haul’ to charge the batteries of the sagging ‘culture war tension machine’. The current urgency is palpable and some ‘blunt force’ revisionism will be required to set the record straight on the top end of town ‘commies in suits’.
Senator Joseph McCarthy was demonised by the world press, but new information— including fifty-year-old FBI recordings of Soviet embassy conversations—prove him correct. Indeed, the United States was overrun at high government and military levels by Communists with strong links to the Soviet Union.1 Despite the passage of time and a plethora of additional data that vindicate his position, intellectual and political discourse on the matter is patchy at best, and nearly non-existent at worst. What does exist is mixed with extreme right versus left rhetoric, replete with the expected anti- Semite ranting and anti-Islamic scorecards.2 3 Instead of a steady mining for greater depth, detail and broad-based understanding, we find surface issues buried in an avalanche of gush, a plethora of verbiage enmeshed with endless scandal and ever- changing headlines — both real and imagined.
Names change from Lachlan Currie, to Harry Dexter White, Nathan Gregory Silver- master, Frank Coe, and Shlomo Adler; to stalwart liars like Dr Kissinger, Dr Amitai Etzioni, and Dr Steve Pieczenik. A gang of generic neocons are cited in the crosshairs of mainstream and alternative media scopes, but only as casually perplexing coffee stains on the pages of history.
Classification of these sophists is difficult, but the tie that binds them is the use of US power to obliterate all national resistance to a predatory banking and financial class whose ‘free trade’ mantra is wearing thin with peasants and many an appointed prince who recites it to them. As they rush to establish new “rule sets” and methods of controlling intellectual inferiors, we wonder who will survive surveillance drone bashing and global processing.
The cited ‘rule sets’ include an unhealthy dose of military industrial technology regulations that centralise power for the reset’s high-tech city state panopticons per UN Habitat Smart Cities Program. This is closely associated with Agendas 2021 and 2030, both of which ostensibly boast sustainable development, but bear benevolent methods for mass population reduction and limited access to resources for all except hidden masters.
Senator McCarthy's legacy mostly involved spies and "security risks”. His greatest concern was communist influence over America’s foreign policy. Harry Hopkins, Roosevelt's closest advisor (who lived in the White House), had regular contacts with Soviet intelligence and helped engineer the disastrous Yalta and Potsdam agreements. The Morgenthau Plan4, which prevented German reconstruction and — as many suggested then and even now — purposely starved them into desperation with the hope they might go communist. This was the brain child of Laughlin Currie and Harry Dexter White (Treasury Department). Abandoning Chiang Kai-shek was the "China Hands" project led by John Stewart Service, John Patton Davies, and Lattimore. Veteran journalist and teacher Stan Evans, director of the National Journalism Centre, describes other major spy networks. In England for example, he says the Burgess Maclean group infiltrated both Washington and London.5
Delving deeper into a less-than-mainstream narrative, one asks ‘Why policymakers are drawn from the same limited pool of existentialist malcontents?’. In practice, they all seem to be drawn from a narrow self-perpetuating clique whose members, after elections, put Republican and Democrat labels in four-year storage. Note, for example, that Henry Kissinger popped up under Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon, and always in foreign policy.
Even after the Vietnam fiasco, the “American Establishment” was able to claim the loyalty of a closed, self-perpetuating circle. Unfortunately, this bipartisan group cursed the USA with a series of bloody wars and catastrophic international problems. Its members are best described as a circle of mystics rather than rational policymakers acting in the national interest.